I recently wrote a rave review of one of my favorite 2012
movies, Paul Thomas Anderson’s The Master,
which I praised for presenting depraved images with a lovingly unrelenting
control. I didn’t know what depraved really meant. William Freidkin’s movie
adaptation of the satirical play Killer
Joe is a truly depraved movie. It concerns a white trash family consisting
solely of disgusting individuals who hire a cold-hearted assassin named Killer
Joe to take care of a relative so that they can come into some money. The
trouble is that they don’t have enough money to pay Killer Joe up front, so he
makes a bargain with them that involves a tween girl, all manner of brutality
and some Kentucky Fried Chicken. You seriously don’t want to know what happens
there.
Matthew McConaughey gives the performance of his career as
the titular murderer, accessing a disturbing side that I’ve never seen before.
If I had known the guy was capable of something like this, I may not have said
such rude things about his acting in the past. The actor insists that he only
agreed to be in the film because he saw it as a very dark comedy, but there’s
nothing funny about it. The movie works because it is disturbing and it is
disturbing because it is as heartless as its characters. I can see where McConaughey
was coming from, though. Some of the acts of violence seen in the film are so
unthinkable and so over-the-top in their presentation that they would seem at
home in a Family Guy episode. Any
potential humor that may have been garnered from the extremity of the random
evils on display here is nowhere to be found. The cold, flippant style of the
film and the fact that people enjoy it is more frightening than anything in it.
Freidkin is one odd filmmaker. His only notable credits are The French Connection and The Exorcist, both from the early 70s
and both works of extreme genius. The latter is often deservedly called one of
the most horrifying movies ever made because of the realistic approach to
supernatural material. Now we have Killer
Joe, which is possibly even scarier because it’s so close to home. I’ve
known people similar to those shown in the film, even if they seem like
caricatures. This movie is more of a reality than I think most people realize,
and perhaps that’s why Freidkin can be so nonchalant about it. Listening to him
discuss the movie makes me think he doesn’t necessarily believe in the events
of his film. I can only assume its fans don’t either. I wouldn’t say I enjoyed the film and would certainly not call it genius, but I admire its audacity. “Something else” is the most I can muster.
7/10
Good review. McConaughey has never been slimier, Hirsch has never been louder, Haden Church has never been dumber, Temple has never been more innocent, and Gershon has never really shown us ALL of her like we see here. Altogether, they make a pretty out-standing ensemble that makes this film tick a whole lot more than I expected.
ReplyDeleteYeah, truth be told, I probably (guiltily) liked it more than I really let on. Any movie that has new ways to shock this late in the cinema game has to be worth something.
Delete