Often called the greatest American novel, F. Scott
Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby is the
stuff of infamy. All through my life, I have heard names such as Gatsby, Daisy,
Callaway and Buchanan mentioned like common knowledge and I’m sure most are
familiar with the iconic symbol of mysterious green light. However, I must
sheepishly admit that I have never read this amazing book before, nor have I
seen any other film adaptation, the most famous being a 70s effort starring
Robert Redford, whom I have heard described as “stiff.” Director Baz Luhrmann’s
The Great Gatsby is anything but
stiff. Campy maybe, over-the-top definitely, but never stiff.
I will refrain from describing the plot in any detail,
because a great deal of it is spoiler-friendly. The film stars Tobey Maguire as
Nick Callaway, a naïve young bond broker in “Roaring Twenties” era New York who
becomes supremely interested in his mysterious millionaire neighbor, played by
Leonardo DiCaprio. This man’s name is Gatsby and he has untold wealth to his
name with which he throws enormous and very expensive parties every weekend.
Gatsby befriends Callaway in the hopes of having a private meeting with
Callaway’s cousin Daisy, who is married to a philandering individual named
Buchanan. I will cease with any further explanation, suffice to say that lives
entangle, mysteries unravel and tensions reach a boiling point. This is all
very high drama and the film toys with the idea of presenting it as such. But
you must remember that Luhrmann is the same individual who placed Romeo and
Juliet in the middle of a modern gang war and had pop songs performed at the
Moulin Rouge in 1900. He would be the last person to tell this story straight.
The Great Gatsby
is a movie that defies anyone to look at it with anything but awe. The photography
is nothing short of stunning and the art design elaborate. The direction is
expectedly eccentric, with some moments giving an impression that characters
will break into song without warning. The first half or so was obviously seen
through musical eyes, a style that many viewers don’t realize is very
difficult. Nothing during filming can go wrong, because everything that happens
has been very precisely planned to sync with a pre-selected score. There is no
singing here, but everything during the early scenes has been painstakingly
choreographed to align with a wide variety of music that ranges from classical
to rap. These scenes are certainly unique, presenting viewers with a dizzying
spectacle of drunken partying that displays great showmanship, but forces the
opening scenes to drag while we wait for something of any actual value to
happen.
The second half is played completely straight-forward with
an astonishing lack of razzle-dazzle, and the movie feels somewhat disjointed
as a result of being pummeled with such fierce drama after such an extended
period of light-headed flash. I don’t believe I really have a problem with this
separation of motives. The first half of the film should hold a fast-paced view
of its overblown marvels, while the second half deserves a chance to slow down
and marvel at the characters. Leonardo DiCaprio has recently reached a peak in
his acting abilities, having never impressed me before as much as he has with
his last few performances. His Gatsby could have sold the movie on its own. I
can’t imagine any other star accessing the same air of mystery, control and
utter loneliness that DiCaprio possesses here. His co-stars don’t make quite
the same impression, but Tobey Maguire is well-suited to play any character
embodied by timidity, and Joel Edgerton is excellent as the two-faced Buchanan.
The only character that gets lost in the shuffle is that of Daisy with Carey
Mulligan, usually superb, giving what I believe is the best performance she
could under the circumstances, which is unfortunately rather bland.
In a sense, this Gatsby movie is as elusive as its hero. It
is a show of visual splendor that is incredible to witness, but which pushes
the true heart of the story farther out of accessibility with each dazzling
frame. The movie desperately tries to pull a dramatic punch in the last quarter
and more or less succeeds, but it’s hard to measure the success of its
emotional power when it’s wrapped up in so much overpowering theatricality. For
what it’s worth, I enjoyed the movie. I would say that it is well worth
watching, but I would also wonder how much better it might have been if it had
hadn’t been quite so ambitious.
7/10

No comments:
Post a Comment